I read The Lost World as my Adventure Classic for the Back to the Classic Challenge 2016 at the book blog Books and Chocolate.
The reader’s enjoyment of The Lost World will definitely depend
upon her (a) suspension of disbelief and (b) her ability to look past the
racial stereotypes of the Victorian/Edwardian era. Arthur Conan Doyle is, of course, much better
known for Sherlock Holmes than for the adventures of Professor Challenger, who is introduces in this book and who went on to
be featured in two further novels and two short stories. The Lost World was a fun sort of romp
in its way, but I doubt I will ever read any further adventures of Professor
Challenger. Personally, my window to have read and really enjoyed this type of
book was probably some time in my tween to early teen years, back when I did
read a couple of Jules Verne and HG Wells books.
The book is very short (less than 250 pages) and the plot is fairly
simple: Professor Challenger, a pompous yet intelligent bull of a man, alleges
to have discovered a land that time forgot somewhere deep in the Amazon, but no
one believes him because all of his evidence was accidentally destroyed upon
his return. Intrepid newspaperman E.D. Malone, always on the lookout for a good
story, is also seeking out a daring and dangerous assignment in the hopes of
impressing the woman he loves. Malone,
along with big game hunter Lord Roxton and biologist Professor Summerlee, band together to travel to
the Amazon to try to either prove or disprove Challenger’s claim. Adventure
ensues!
As I mentioned above, there are more than a few unfortunate racial stereotypes
to be found in the book, along with attempted genocide, slavery, and a general
belief in the superiority of “civilized” white Europeans over any other group. I
can’t put my finger on why these attitudes bother me in some books but in others
(like The Secret Garden), they do not. What I did enjoy about The Lost World was
the sense of adventure and discovery expressed in the story. It is
hard to imagine today that there is a square foot of the earth’s surface that
hasn’t already been surveyed and catalogued but I think a person at the turn of
the 20th century could very well conceive of an undiscovered island or plateau
just waiting for scientific discovery and research. I also loved the illustrations (drawings and
faked photos) in the book. I am a total sucker for that type of thing!
I don’t regret reading this at all, but as I wrote above, I think I read
this book too late in life. I had a similar experience with two other Victorian
classics: Dracula and The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,
but for different reasons. I honestly
enjoyed the forward written by Michael Crichton, in the Modern Library edition that I read shown above, more than I did the actual
book.
I've been looking for a good book for this category myself, but I don't think this one is for me. I just got over looking past Dickens' racial stereotypes in Oliver Twist, and I'm not looking to working that hard again for awhile! On the other hand, I loved Dracula, but only sort of liked Jekyll and Hyde. I definitely know what you meant about missing the window of enjoying certain books. I'm sure I would loathe The Catcher in the Rye if I actually ever get around to reading it now that I am no longer a young person.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment Jane! Yes, I too had trouble with the depiction of Fagin in Oliver Twist.
DeleteMy biggest problem with Dracula was really that I knew too much. All that dithering about what was going on and of course, I knew the count's secret!
I love Professor Challenger! His character just cracks me up. I've read the next story, and while I still loved him, the plot itself wasn't very strong. If you were lukewarm on this, it's probably best to finish here.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment Rob! I can see how readers would find Professor Challenger hilarious. He is comically arrogant. I’ll take your advice and if I read any further Conan-Doyle, I will stick with Sherlock Holmes.
DeleteNice review. I read this novel for this challenge in 2015. See
ReplyDeletehttp://majoryammerton.blogspot.com/search?q=lost+world
Conan Doyle wrote lots of adventure historical fiction. He wanted to be remembered for that fiction, not Holmes. Funny how things work out.
Thanks for the comment Major! I have also heard about how Conan Doyle tried to kill Holmes off and the public outcry was so great he had to bring him back to life. I wonder what he would think about the current incarnations of Holmes and Watson and the fact that these characters still capture the public interest.
Delete